Why Bother to Network If You Already Know Everyone You Need to Know?

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

LinkedInnovators logoIn the LinkedInnovators Yahoo Group, the perennial debate has re-surfaced about LinkedIn linking behaviors — is it better to connect with as many people as possible? Or only those you already know? Or somewhere in between? In the course of the conversation, Barbara Dobrinsky Holtzman posed the question:

If you already know everyone you need to know to accomplish everything you’d like to in life, why bother to network at all?

Here’s my take on this: I’m not saying you should never meet new people – that would be absurd. But most people haven’t even scratched the surface of the potential that exists in the network they already have.

To answer your question as to why to network, even if you know almost everyone you need to know to accomplish everything you’d like to in life:

Information – To learn more about them and share more about me so that we might discover those as-yet-undiscovered opportunities to be of service to each other. To brainstorm. To share expertise and ideas.

Character – People can’t know your character from your LinkedIn profile, and only minimally from a blog. When it comes to hiring people for critical positions or contractual work, character becomes extremely important, and you need people who know you well enough to vouch for your character.

Competence – Your LinkedIn profile shows what you claim to know. A blog is a bit better. But it is only through interaction – through seeing someone’s expertise applied in context, that we really see just how much someone knows about what they’re doing.

Strength leads to action. For all the talk of the benefits of weak ties (a misinterpretation of Granovetter, though, as I’ve written about before), there is in networking the concept of an “action threshold”. People have to know you well enough to be willing to take action on your behalf. Simply put, the better people know you, the more willing they are to do more for you (and you for them).

Can you honestly say that you have tapped into even a tiny fraction of the potential of the network you already have? What’s the point in adding a bunch more hypothetical potential when you haven’t even tapped into what’s there? It’s like buying more land to drill for oil when all you’ve done with the land you own is start drilling one or two wells, and you haven’t even surveyed the rest of it.

I frequently hear the argument for making more connections that, “You never know where your next opportunity might come from. If I don’t connect, I might miss that next opportunity!”

To my thinking, that’s “lack consciousness”. How much opportunity have you “missed” in your existing network because you haven’t really worked it?

The way I see it, there is more opportunity in my network than I know what to do with – than I can possibly ever act on. The purpose of my network, for me, is not to continue spreading like wildfire in search of new opportunities, but to filter out all the noise and let the really great opportunities rise to my attention.

In the course of that activity, a few really interesting people will get added, but I don’t really seek them out just for the purposes of making new contacts. They come naturally as a part of the more focused activity, and they are typically far more oriented to doing something immediately that’s of mutual benefit.

Originally posted by me in The Virtual Handshake Blog

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.


  1. Who better to spread the gospel of LinkedIn than my friend Scott Allen? As a trailblazer in the network scene you have always lead the way and I’m excited to see this newest venture unfold.

    Great comment on what I consider to be one of the ongoing questions about building a network which is building a network of known contacts or quality, vs building a larger network, or quantity. I think the best answer is to build both – large and trusted – but if I had to settle for one or the other quantity would win out.

  2. My good friend, @charliecurve tells me that he’s an “And” guy.
    And in Networking, I think you have to be. Yes, you can’t be sure from where your next opportunities may arise: maybe from a new relationship AND an old one. When you start looking at the common threads that bind us all, the world keeps getting smaller (someone should make an amusement park ride about small worlds).

    I have been a very, very open networker on Linkedin. I have more connections than I care to count. B U T when ever any of them reach out to me, I do my best to assist them. Occasionally, I need to tap into them too. I am hopeful they will return the favor.

    I look at networking from 2 perspectives (in fact, I really want to change the word networking, but that’s another post)

    1. Meet. Understand. Connect. That’s what networking simply is. If you are not meeting/communicating with people and taking the time to understand them and have them understand you, there will be no connections.

    2. Leveraging the relationships you have to create the relationships you need.

    I loved your post Scott. Thanks for sharing.

    Terry Bean

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Friday linkdump : social computing - A Frog in the Valley - Technology Intelligence

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.