<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 New LinkedIn Features 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://LinkedIntelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/</link>
	<description>The unofficial source for all things LinkedIn™.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Got LinkedIn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Save LinkedIn Profile as a PDF</title>
		<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Got LinkedIn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Save LinkedIn Profile as a PDF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=381#comment-736</guid>
		<description>[...] across a post from Dec. 30th.? In this post he was discussing some of the features added in 2007 (See Full List) and noticed he mentioned a way to save a profile to a pdf.? I&#8217;ve looked at 100&#8217;s of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] across a post from Dec. 30th.? In this post he was discussing some of the features added in 2007 (See Full List) and noticed he mentioned a way to save a profile to a pdf.? I&#8217;ve looked at 100&#8217;s of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=381#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Good summary, thank you.

I think we should all be careful not just to repeat all of LinkedIn&#039;s own claims about its &quot;new features.&quot; Your number 6 does this. As I blogged at the time, there were no new management features added at the time of posting you link to. A week or so later they added one feature which had been recommended to them months earlier (showing pending members&#039; profile links from the pending list).

Groups really didn&#039;t change functionally at all this year, beyond the ease of creating a group. You create a group once - but you&#039;re stuck with the features forever. That&#039;s where the improvements should go. Why make it easier to create a group that doesn&#039;t have real functionality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary, thank you.</p>
<p>I think we should all be careful not just to repeat all of LinkedIn&#8217;s own claims about its &#8220;new features.&#8221; Your number 6 does this. As I blogged at the time, there were no new management features added at the time of posting you link to. A week or so later they added one feature which had been recommended to them months earlier (showing pending members&#8217; profile links from the pending list).</p>
<p>Groups really didn&#8217;t change functionally at all this year, beyond the ease of creating a group. You create a group once &#8211; but you&#8217;re stuck with the features forever. That&#8217;s where the improvements should go. Why make it easier to create a group that doesn&#8217;t have real functionality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=381#comment-735</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Not only do they have processes in place which usually resolve the issue, you can actually get hold of a real person (via email) who can help.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have never gotten anything but an automated non-answer from LinkedIn. That&#039;s usually a promise for a reply that never comes. Getting a resolution or reply from a human must be a paid-feature only.

My experience is that LinkedIn is only slightly less responsive to reported problems and inquiries than... Yahoo Mail Customer Service. And that&#039;s bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Not only do they have processes in place which usually resolve the issue, you can actually get hold of a real person (via email) who can help.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have never gotten anything but an automated non-answer from LinkedIn. That&#8217;s usually a promise for a reply that never comes. Getting a resolution or reply from a human must be a paid-feature only.</p>
<p>My experience is that LinkedIn is only slightly less responsive to reported problems and inquiries than&#8230; Yahoo Mail Customer Service. And that&#8217;s bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
