<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Networking Lessons from Gene Simmons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linkedintelligence.com/networking-lessons-from-gene-simmons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/networking-lessons-from-gene-simmons/</link>
	<description>The unofficial source for all things LinkedIn®</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheridan Berry</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/networking-lessons-from-gene-simmons/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheridan Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=425#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Actually, I do not believe in networking. But do not get me wrong, I have nothing against people who believe in it and practice it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I do not believe in networking. But do not get me wrong, I have nothing against people who believe in it and practice it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amitai Givertz</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/networking-lessons-from-gene-simmons/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Amitai Givertz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 09:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=425#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Scott, to your point on &quot;action threshold,&quot; Gene Simmons says: &quot;Some of us can knock on some doors and some doors will open because of who is knocking on the door.&quot;

But the light linkers you describe are also working a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rohitsrealm.com/archive/2007/05/02/an-economic-analysis-of-interpersonal-relations/http:/snarkybehavior.com/2007/09/10/five-degrees-of-friendship-part-1/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;quantity over quality threshold&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; no?

Luke 11:9 says: &quot;And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you.&quot;

If Gene&#039;s wisdom roughly translates to trust in the person, doesn&#039;t Luke&#039;s proverb roughly translate as trust in the process? The door opens not because of who you are but because of what you do [seek, find, knock].

The depth of relationship building that you describe is predicated on exclusivity. It&#039;s who you know and how well you know &#039;em, and visa versa. You described it as deep.

Light-linking  is about indiscriminate inclusiveness and for a purpose altogether different from leveraging personal connections. Isn&#039;t it about leveraging critical mass?

I can&#039;t imagine that anyone in their right mind systematically builds a 500 plus network on LinkedIn expecting to 499 people to say, &quot;Hey, Ami, it&#039;s you! Sorry I&#039;m a bit light today, will you take nine grand instead, 86 the bun?&quot; any more than I should upset if my howdy-doodies go unanswered.

Somewhere between the Relationship Economy and Network Economy we have LinkedIn. It seems to me that the romantic notion persists that it should somehow reflect the qualities of both. I don&#039;t see how it can.

You say it might be time to re-evaluate LinkedIn, change our networking strategy. I&#039;m afraid the days of LinkedIn being about networking -- for the most connected users at least -- are long gone. That said, it remains a strategic play which is why we [open networkers] keep banging it.

In struggling to reconcile all of this for myself, my own networking and relationship building, I think  the surrealist painter Mimi Parent said it best: &quot;Knock hard, life is deaf.&quot;

Thanks for the post and leading me here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, to your point on &#8220;action threshold,&#8221; Gene Simmons says: &#8220;Some of us can knock on some doors and some doors will open because of who is knocking on the door.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the light linkers you describe are also working a &#8220;<a href="http://www.rohitsrealm.com/archive/2007/05/02/an-economic-analysis-of-interpersonal-relations/http:/snarkybehavior.com/2007/09/10/five-degrees-of-friendship-part-1/" rel="nofollow">quantity over quality threshold</a>,&#8221; no?</p>
<p>Luke 11:9 says: &#8220;And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Gene&#8217;s wisdom roughly translates to trust in the person, doesn&#8217;t Luke&#8217;s proverb roughly translate as trust in the process? The door opens not because of who you are but because of what you do [seek, find, knock].</p>
<p>The depth of relationship building that you describe is predicated on exclusivity. It&#8217;s who you know and how well you know &#8216;em, and visa versa. You described it as deep.</p>
<p>Light-linking  is about indiscriminate inclusiveness and for a purpose altogether different from leveraging personal connections. Isn&#8217;t it about leveraging critical mass?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine that anyone in their right mind systematically builds a 500 plus network on LinkedIn expecting to 499 people to say, &#8220;Hey, Ami, it&#8217;s you! Sorry I&#8217;m a bit light today, will you take nine grand instead, 86 the bun?&#8221; any more than I should upset if my howdy-doodies go unanswered.</p>
<p>Somewhere between the Relationship Economy and Network Economy we have LinkedIn. It seems to me that the romantic notion persists that it should somehow reflect the qualities of both. I don&#8217;t see how it can.</p>
<p>You say it might be time to re-evaluate LinkedIn, change our networking strategy. I&#8217;m afraid the days of LinkedIn being about networking &#8212; for the most connected users at least &#8212; are long gone. That said, it remains a strategic play which is why we [open networkers] keep banging it.</p>
<p>In struggling to reconcile all of this for myself, my own networking and relationship building, I think  the surrealist painter Mimi Parent said it best: &#8220;Knock hard, life is deaf.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for the post and leading me here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/networking-lessons-from-gene-simmons/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=425#comment-928</guid>
		<description>Gene has been doing this for longer than Trump has been relevant.  Gene should have the power to &quot;fire&quot; the Donald.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene has been doing this for longer than Trump has been relevant.  Gene should have the power to &#8220;fire&#8221; the Donald.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Alba</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/networking-lessons-from-gene-simmons/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Alba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=425#comment-927</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think that today I&#039;d read a blog where an exec career coach says that I get it, in the same sentence that Gene Simmons gets it (it was fun watching him get fired last week).

Having Bob Burg forward my book was amazing. From the question &quot;who should forward this?&quot; (Vincent Wright answered that question for me) to getting a very comprehensive forward, along with suggestions for the rest of the book, really blew me away.

It did happen because of &quot;deep relationships.&quot; And Scott is right, I&#039;d do whatever Bob asks me to.

To be honest, and not to sound sappy, what I saw was the American Dream (happening throughout the world). No bureaucracy, no red tape. It was very much givers gain, relationship stuff that allowed us to get amazing results. Huge thanks to Vincent Wright, and to you, Scott, for facilitating this. And of course, to Bob who proved to some unknown guy (me) that he is a very classy person.

Jason Alba
CEO, author</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think that today I&#8217;d read a blog where an exec career coach says that I get it, in the same sentence that Gene Simmons gets it (it was fun watching him get fired last week).</p>
<p>Having Bob Burg forward my book was amazing. From the question &#8220;who should forward this?&#8221; (Vincent Wright answered that question for me) to getting a very comprehensive forward, along with suggestions for the rest of the book, really blew me away.</p>
<p>It did happen because of &#8220;deep relationships.&#8221; And Scott is right, I&#8217;d do whatever Bob asks me to.</p>
<p>To be honest, and not to sound sappy, what I saw was the American Dream (happening throughout the world). No bureaucracy, no red tape. It was very much givers gain, relationship stuff that allowed us to get amazing results. Huge thanks to Vincent Wright, and to you, Scott, for facilitating this. And of course, to Bob who proved to some unknown guy (me) that he is a very classy person.</p>
<p>Jason Alba<br />
CEO, author</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/networking-lessons-from-gene-simmons/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=425#comment-926</guid>
		<description>Although Gene&#039;s abrasive style eventually got the better of him. There&#039;s a lesson there, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Gene&#8217;s abrasive style eventually got the better of him. There&#8217;s a lesson there, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Stout</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/networking-lessons-from-gene-simmons/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Stout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=425#comment-925</guid>
		<description>Gene, Bob, John, Jason, Doc et al - - get it. I have been an executive career advisor for years and networking is still the most profitable process for finding a new position. Now, thanks to the internet, and sites like LinkedIn - - it is easier, more fun and you can reach out to people throughout the world. It is a 2-way street, you must be willing to help others along the way, but the return on investment would make even Warren Buffett feel good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene, Bob, John, Jason, Doc et al &#8211; - get it. I have been an executive career advisor for years and networking is still the most profitable process for finding a new position. Now, thanks to the internet, and sites like LinkedIn &#8211; - it is easier, more fun and you can reach out to people throughout the world. It is a 2-way street, you must be willing to help others along the way, but the return on investment would make even Warren Buffett feel good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

