<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn Answers? Or LinkedIn Spammers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/</link>
	<description>The unofficial source for all things LinkedIn®</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top New LinkedIn Features 2007</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Top New LinkedIn Features 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=80#comment-215</guid>
		<description>[...] - LinkedIn Answers LinkedIn&#8217;s first foray into public interaction started off on shaky ground, but it has become one of the most useful resources on the web. People have used it for market [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; LinkedIn Answers LinkedIn&#8217;s first foray into public interaction started off on shaky ground, but it has become one of the most useful resources on the web. People have used it for market [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen Sharib</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen Sharib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=80#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Is there a site that explains how Q&amp;A works? Who can &quot;flag&quot; the question or answer? Is it a number of flags and the q or a disappears? Is there someone at LI who ultimately decides on the flagging rationale? If your q or a is &quot;flagged&#039; does itr affect your account? How does the whole thing WORK?

Who is watching the watchers?
Maureen Sharib</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a site that explains how Q&amp;A works? Who can &#8220;flag&#8221; the question or answer? Is it a number of flags and the q or a disappears? Is there someone at LI who ultimately decides on the flagging rationale? If your q or a is &#8220;flagged&#8217; does itr affect your account? How does the whole thing WORK?</p>
<p>Who is watching the watchers?<br />
Maureen Sharib</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnnei</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnnei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=80#comment-213</guid>
		<description>My two pence....

The feature is nice, though it turns LinkedIn into something it is not - a mailing server.

The feature allows you to choose the type of the content that is sent. One of the type is - promoting your business. That in a way is an indication that such material is allowed. I for one, have assumed that if you can define the type of the content sent - there must be a way to define a personal filter as to what types you may receive.

But there is a larger issue. Is sending your close contacts a message can be regarded as a spam. In my mind, networking with other people is also a commitment, not just another registry. It is a commitment to listen to your contact requests and messages (questions) and reply. If you find the messages not appropriate, it is your duty as a contact (in my opinion) to indicate that and ask not to receive certain types of messages. Or, you should not maintain your contact.

This is by the way one of the reasons that I advise people to be cautious about turning into a power networker. The more contacts you have the larger your burden. If you can&#039;t take it - stay with your real close friends.

To conclude - Questions are sent to close contacts. If you want contacts, learn how to manage them and how to build the trust by indicating to them what are your preferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My two pence&#8230;.</p>
<p>The feature is nice, though it turns LinkedIn into something it is not &#8211; a mailing server.</p>
<p>The feature allows you to choose the type of the content that is sent. One of the type is &#8211; promoting your business. That in a way is an indication that such material is allowed. I for one, have assumed that if you can define the type of the content sent &#8211; there must be a way to define a personal filter as to what types you may receive.</p>
<p>But there is a larger issue. Is sending your close contacts a message can be regarded as a spam. In my mind, networking with other people is also a commitment, not just another registry. It is a commitment to listen to your contact requests and messages (questions) and reply. If you find the messages not appropriate, it is your duty as a contact (in my opinion) to indicate that and ask not to receive certain types of messages. Or, you should not maintain your contact.</p>
<p>This is by the way one of the reasons that I advise people to be cautious about turning into a power networker. The more contacts you have the larger your burden. If you can&#8217;t take it &#8211; stay with your real close friends.</p>
<p>To conclude &#8211; Questions are sent to close contacts. If you want contacts, learn how to manage them and how to build the trust by indicating to them what are your preferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric scheid</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>eric scheid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=80#comment-212</guid>
		<description>My #1 wish for LI Answers is that they get filtered through my network in a similar way to how requests get filtered. That is: if i post a question then only my immediate contacts will see it, but then they can one-click some button that re-publishes the question to their entire network.

If my question is obviously spammy then it won&#039;t get far and I&#039;ll only annoy my direct contacts. If my question is particularly intriguing then it will travel further afield and garner more answers.

Obviously this works in reverse too - I&#039;ll only get annoyed by spammers in my first degree (and I&#039;ll soon disconnect them), and the deluge of questions I get to see will instead be reduced to a trickle of high quality and interesting questions.

As it is now, with questions broadcast to everyone up to 3 degrees away, it just doesn&#039;t scale. More transactional relationships please, less passive broadcast networks thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My #1 wish for LI Answers is that they get filtered through my network in a similar way to how requests get filtered. That is: if i post a question then only my immediate contacts will see it, but then they can one-click some button that re-publishes the question to their entire network.</p>
<p>If my question is obviously spammy then it won&#8217;t get far and I&#8217;ll only annoy my direct contacts. If my question is particularly intriguing then it will travel further afield and garner more answers.</p>
<p>Obviously this works in reverse too &#8211; I&#8217;ll only get annoyed by spammers in my first degree (and I&#8217;ll soon disconnect them), and the deluge of questions I get to see will instead be reduced to a trickle of high quality and interesting questions.</p>
<p>As it is now, with questions broadcast to everyone up to 3 degrees away, it just doesn&#8217;t scale. More transactional relationships please, less passive broadcast networks thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod McPherson</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod McPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=80#comment-211</guid>
		<description>I liek the feature but it is open to misuse as you rightly point out. I, for one, dont want to see every question on my home page and my first quesion was to see if others thought the same way, they do. Filtering is very desirable for the homepage. As a product LinkedIn needs to meet consumer needs and as consumers we need to have our needs heard and met.

I dont think that LinkedIn needs to play policeman but the community ought to manage the feature, after all we are all thinking adults.

Rod McPherson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liek the feature but it is open to misuse as you rightly point out. I, for one, dont want to see every question on my home page and my first quesion was to see if others thought the same way, they do. Filtering is very desirable for the homepage. As a product LinkedIn needs to meet consumer needs and as consumers we need to have our needs heard and met.</p>
<p>I dont think that LinkedIn needs to play policeman but the community ought to manage the feature, after all we are all thinking adults.</p>
<p>Rod McPherson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Woodard</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Woodard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=80#comment-210</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely right Scott. Stomping out spam should be LinkedIn&#039;s priority right now. I sent a message yesterday to one of their lead engineers. There&#039;s great potential, but it is a complete turn off if they don&#039;t do a better job of cleaning it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right Scott. Stomping out spam should be LinkedIn&#8217;s priority right now. I sent a message yesterday to one of their lead engineers. There&#8217;s great potential, but it is a complete turn off if they don&#8217;t do a better job of cleaning it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Wright</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 07:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=80#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Scott,
I&#039;d like to echo David&#039;s comment, when I first saw Linkedin Answers, I also thought: &quot;At LAST!&quot;

And then, within 24 hours, I thought: &quot;That didn&#039;t last!&quot;

Now, Scott, I&#039;m not going to say that I actually saw a UFO back in the 1970&#039;s but, I&#039;m really starting to wonder WHERE some of these spammers come from! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
I&#8217;d like to echo David&#8217;s comment, when I first saw Linkedin Answers, I also thought: &#8220;At LAST!&#8221;</p>
<p>And then, within 24 hours, I thought: &#8220;That didn&#8217;t last!&#8221;</p>
<p>Now, Scott, I&#8217;m not going to say that I actually saw a UFO back in the 1970&#8242;s but, I&#8217;m really starting to wonder WHERE some of these spammers come from! <img src='http://linkedintelligence.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Regler</title>
		<link>http://linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-answers-or-linkedin-spammers/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>David Regler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=80#comment-208</guid>
		<description>When I saw LinkedIn Answers today I thought... this is really cool. It&#039;s a great feature and unlocks real value for all LinkedIn users.

As the day wore on you could just see where this was going.

You&#039;re 100% right, Scott: LinkedIn need to take immediate action.

I hope they do.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw LinkedIn Answers today I thought&#8230; this is really cool. It&#8217;s a great feature and unlocks real value for all LinkedIn users.</p>
<p>As the day wore on you could just see where this was going.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re 100% right, Scott: LinkedIn need to take immediate action.</p>
<p>I hope they do.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

