<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asymmetrical Relationships and LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://LinkedIntelligence.com/asymmetrical-relationships-and-linkedin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/asymmetrical-relationships-and-linkedin/</link>
	<description>The unofficial source for all things LinkedIn™.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linked Intelligence &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Writing Great LinkedIn Invitations</title>
		<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/asymmetrical-relationships-and-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Linked Intelligence &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Writing Great LinkedIn Invitations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=356#comment-726</guid>
		<description>[...] said, there are some exceptions. One thing LinkedIn doesn’t handle very well is asymmetrical relationships. Typically, a vendor doesn’t necessarily know a whole lot about their customer, except maybe that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said, there are some exceptions. One thing LinkedIn doesn’t handle very well is asymmetrical relationships. Typically, a vendor doesn’t necessarily know a whole lot about their customer, except maybe that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now Is Gone » B2B Social Networking Usage</title>
		<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/asymmetrical-relationships-and-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Now Is Gone » B2B Social Networking Usage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=356#comment-725</guid>
		<description>[...] provides interesting asymmetrical relationships, and is more trust oriented.&#160; As a result, it has become a preferred business social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] provides interesting asymmetrical relationships, and is more trust oriented.&nbsp; As a result, it has become a preferred business social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Rzepkowski</title>
		<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/asymmetrical-relationships-and-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Rzepkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=356#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,
I did attend one of your presentations eons ago, when you were first doing your webinars. You&#039;ve continued to build on your valuable advice which I appreciate very much. So, my question on this post is...What features could/should LinkedIn build to help sort out this asymmetry?

Features like Facebook&#039;s Social Timeline, or being able to categorize your lists of connections after classifying them, perhaps having classifications automatically created for you based on activity levels, would provide ways better leveraging this asymmetry. I don&#039;t think it would turn everyone into open networkers, but it might encourage just a few more loose connections to be maintained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,<br />
I did attend one of your presentations eons ago, when you were first doing your webinars. You&#8217;ve continued to build on your valuable advice which I appreciate very much. So, my question on this post is&#8230;What features could/should LinkedIn build to help sort out this asymmetry?</p>
<p>Features like Facebook&#8217;s Social Timeline, or being able to categorize your lists of connections after classifying them, perhaps having classifications automatically created for you based on activity levels, would provide ways better leveraging this asymmetry. I don&#8217;t think it would turn everyone into open networkers, but it might encourage just a few more loose connections to be maintained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khurt Williams</title>
		<link>http://LinkedIntelligence.com/asymmetrical-relationships-and-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Khurt Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=356#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Timely post. I am taking a good look at my LinkedIn connections and realize that I know some of these are connections in only a cursory way. I work at the same firm as a lot of my connections and may have seen the names on memos, email etc..but I do not personally know their work. Alsor, they do not personally know my work. So some of these connections are just, as you stated, &quot;electronic&quot; links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timely post. I am taking a good look at my LinkedIn connections and realize that I know some of these are connections in only a cursory way. I work at the same firm as a lot of my connections and may have seen the names on memos, email etc..but I do not personally know their work. Alsor, they do not personally know my work. So some of these connections are just, as you stated, &#8220;electronic&#8221; links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
